29.1 C
Delhi
Saturday, October 23, 2021

Nw: Court's strength of contempt cannot be taken away even by legislative enactment, says SC

- Ads by Adsterra -
- Ads by Google-

A bench of Justices acknowledged the chairperson of the NGO, Suraj India Believe, Rajiv Daiya has been “throwing mud” at every body including the court, administrative workers and the Divulge executive

A bench of Justices acknowledged the chairperson of the NGO, Suraj India Believe, Rajiv Daiya has been “throwing mud” at every body including the court, administrative workers and the Divulge executive

Return to frontpage

Observing that the court’s strength of contempt cannot be taken away even by a legislative enactment, the Supreme Court on September 29 held the chairperson of an NGO guilty of contempt for not depositing ₹25 lakh for “scandalising and browbeating” the court .

“We’re of the peep that the contemnor is clearly guilty of contempt of court and his action to scandalise the court cannot be countenanced,” the tip court acknowledged.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MM Sundresh acknowledged the chairperson of the NGO, Suraj India Believe, Rajiv Daiya has been “throwing mud” at every body including the court, administrative workers and the Divulge executive.

“The potential to punish for contempt is a constitutional strength vested with this court which cannot be taken away even by a legislative enactment,” the court acknowledged.

The top court issued deem to Mr. Daiya and directed him to be level to on October 7 for hearing of the sentence.

In regards to restoration of cash, the bench acknowledged it’ll care for set up as arrears of land earnings.

The top court had issued contempt deem to Mr. Daiya as to why he could perchance well perchance aloof not be proceeded against and for his endeavour to scandalise the court.

Mr. Daiya had educated the bench that he did not have the sources to pay the costs imposed by the apex court and would map the President of India with a mercy plea.

The apex court used to be hearing an utility filed by Mr. Daiya seeking purchase of the apex court’s 2017 judgement in which it had imposed costs of ₹25 lakh on it for filing 64 PILs over the years with none success and “time and again missing” the jurisdiction of the tip court.

Return to frontpage Our code of editorial values

Source

- Ads by Google -
Latest news
- Ads by Google -
Related news
- Ads by Google -